<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Consultancies on Rough Edges</title><link>https://roughedges.dev/tags/consultancies/</link><description>Recent content in Consultancies on Rough Edges</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://roughedges.dev/tags/consultancies/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Consultancies and Contractors: Lessons From Both Sides of the Table</title><link>https://roughedges.dev/posts/consultancies-and-contractors/</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://roughedges.dev/posts/consultancies-and-contractors/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The pitch from a consultancy is compelling. Expertise on demand. Faster delivery. Flexible headcount you can scale back when the project ends. In principle, there&amp;rsquo;s nothing wrong with any of that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In practice, I&amp;rsquo;ve rarely seen it work as advertised. I&amp;rsquo;ve been on both sides – working at a consultancy and hiring contractors and consulting teams into my own organizations – and the same problems surface repeatedly. That doesn&amp;rsquo;t make outside help always wrong. But it does mean you need to go in with clear eyes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>